I bought mine new in 2011, and it sucked in every way possible, including things that reviews don't always talk about. For example, the keyboard lasted three months. Their customer support was just as useless when it broke under warranty. They really should have recalled the whole laptop and apologized for selling such garbage (based on a generic laptop platform from Quanta - there were HP models that looked exactly the same, down to the port layout). I thought the AC adapter was the only part that wasn't completely useless (being made by Delta). I mentioned fraying because it has a big plug with a stiff strain relief, and the DC input jack on the laptop itself is in a really bad location. At one point, I was running it off an HP AC adapter from 2002 (same voltage and plug size, but 75W instead of 65W) just because it had a right-angle plug.
There were also things that weren't Toshiba's fault, like the CPU being painfully slow in every application except synthetic benchmarks. It got a higher Passmark score than older Core 2 Duo systems that were actually significantly faster in real software (night-and-day differences in stuff like compile times), and every time I said that back when this laptop was somewhat new, people made some really insane excuses to try to defend that CPU just because it was Intel Sandy Bridge.
Since I'm now an engineer, I'm more curious about what is actually wrong with it instead of the vague "overheating and sparking" statement that's in every electrical product recall.
Edited by lti, 24 February 2024 - 02:21 PM.